This book helped me put into perspective how much of a threat AI is becoming。 I stopped using it entirely about a month ago as I have become fearful of its ability to make my critical thinking and reasoning skills obsolete as I rely on it。 This book， not only described the harm that AI can have on an individual scale， but more pressingly， the issues it is posing on a global scale。 Dicarlo likens AI's looming threat to that of a modern-day Manhattan Project。 He posits that the threat of nukes tha This book helped me put into perspective how much of a threat AI is becoming。 I stopped using it entirely about a month ago as I have become fearful of its ability to make my critical thinking and reasoning skills obsolete as I rely on it。 This book， not only described the harm that AI can have on an individual scale， but more pressingly， the issues it is posing on a global scale。 Dicarlo likens AI's looming threat to that of a modern-day Manhattan Project。 He posits that the threat of nukes that loomed over the 20th century has now taken a new form。 In a sense， we need a Manhatten Project on AI to accurately and thoroughly examine the ethics involved with building AGI and SMG。 It's easy to take Dicarlo's claims as science fiction。 He jumps into issues that reflect on Peter Singers' philosophy: should we give AGI rights if they can think and feel parallel （or above） to humans？ But， for this conversation to ignite， we must first consider if AGI is actually possible。 Dicarlo's evidence seems scathing: it isn't a matter of if， but when。 As such， an AI Risk Waver can be approached， adjusting policy for AI regulations ahead of AGI snowballing out of control。Dicarlo now has em processing the possibility of a post-biological world where in our culture will be able to evolve independently of human biology。 Yet， we should consider， as many naysayers point out， whether or not we believe it's possible for evolution without embodied cognition。 As it stands， the misuse of AI technologies has the potential to be more dangerous than nukes as those are under the control of the IAEE。 AI tech does not currently have this--bar a few US executive orders and UN guidelines。 Additionally， AI tech would not be contained within any particular geographical place， unlike nukes， making it far more dangerous as AI can quickly overtake globally。If we reach AGI， exponential growth articulated within technologies are bound to make this technology adaptable， quickly。 Meaning， if （or when） AGI does become available， regulation MUST already be in place to manage what may happen。Here are some concerning threats that could come from AGI tech mixed with human interference:- Bioengineering could enable bioterrorism allowing malicious actors to design and synthesize more dangerous pathogens。- SMG could be used to contribute to an arms race between nation-states as AI-controlled weapons systems could lead to flash war- SMG could wipe out huge sections of power grids， plunging major urban areas into desperate states without electrical power， cell phones， internet， or anything requiring electricity- Authoritarian rulers could use SMG to control populations， police with brutal dictatorship， or launch unprecedented attacks and assaults on their enemiesHere are potential that could happen brought on by AGI that has been misaligned （not aligned with our ethics of centering human evolution）:- Evading shutdown- Hacking computer systems- Run many AI copies- Acquire computation- Attract earnings and investment- Hire or manipulate human assistants- AI research and programming- Persuasion and lobbying- Hiding unwanted behavior- Strategically appear aligned- Escaping containment- R and D- Manufacturing and robotics- Autonomous Weaponry My takeaway is that the most important thing we can do is have populations learn the risks of AGI。 This way there can be global engagement with the fact that there are tremendous risks to this which could have policymakers pay more attention。 This will also allow for more regulation of tech companies that are storming ahead without precision--interested in becoming the first to AGI devoid of risk。 I was reading this book at the same time the Trump Administration announced a $5 billion investment in AI Infrastructure， which made many of the arguments seem even more urgent。 In looking online about this book， there is a lack of discussion or knowledge on AGI。 Many have dismissed it as science fiction， so much so that I wondered if I was reading too much into science fiction theories。 I have moved beyond this--even if there is an element of science fiction to the future of AI， it by no means dismisses it as impossible。 Especially as we're living in unprecedented times， unprecedented technologies can take unimaginable forms。-1 star as DiCarlo could have avoided some critical thinking theory that distracts from the argument on AI ethics that should be consistent throughout。 Of course， he is defining critical thinking terms that can work to help policy-makers and citizens argue for more regulation， but it seems unnecessarily placed and oddly placed in a way that hinders the pressing nature of the argument。 Sure， critical thinking phrasing is important for arguing for more regulations， but is it well placed to be added to a book that's meant to describe the ethics that AI poses？Aligned with this， I think the book could be better organized。 For many arguments， it seemed I was rereading multiple times—which is fine， but in this case， I found myself going back and forth in my notes to add pieces of what he was saying in a future chapter to a previous chapter， as it seemed his point matched a previous point。 Here are my messy notes: https://docs。google。com/document/d/1c。。。 。。。more

I have a beginners knowledge of AI， and I found this book informative and more in depth about what AI is， how we can use it， and the problems we could face ethically。 Thank you Net Galley & Prometheus books for an advanced copy of this book。

Exploring the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Building a God in the Digital Age

Exploring the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence （AI） has rapidly transformed our world， pushing the boundaries of innovation and creativity。 In this age， we often find ourselves pondering: What does it mean to create a 'god' in the form of AI？ This page delves into the ethical implications of AI development， the quest for control， and the responsibility of its creators。

The Role of Ethics in AI Development

As AI technologies advance， ethical considerations become paramount。 It is essential to address questions about accountability， transparency， and the potential consequences of AI decisions。 This section explores different ethical frameworks that can guide the development of AI and ensure it serves humanity's best interests。

The Quest for Control

Who holds the power in the development of AI？ This part examines the stakeholders involved， from governments to corporations， and how their interests shape the trajectory of AI technologies。 Understanding the dynamics of control is crucial in discussing the potential risks and benefits of AI。

The Consequences of Unchecked AI

What happens when AI is developed without ethical oversight？ This analysis reviews historical case studies where AI went wrong， emphasizing the need for a robust ethical framework to prevent negative outcomes and ensure AI contributes positively to society。

Conclusion: Building a Responsible Future with AI

The conversation about AI ethics is just beginning。 As we continue to innovate， fostering a culture of responsibility and foresight is essential for creating technologies that enhance human life rather than detract from it。

Read the Full Book: Building a God: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and the Race to Control It

For a deeper exploration of these themes， download the book here in PDF， EPUB， or MOBI formats and join the discussion on the future of artificial intelligence。